Please don't sweat the tweet stuff, as U.S.–China rift tests markets

May 28, 2019 Patrick Ercolano

After tumbling nearly 2.5% on May 13th—the fallout from a series of tweets by President Donald Trump to escalate tariffs in the U.S.–China trade war—U.S. markets had mostly recovered in the week that followed.

An executive order to ban Chinese technology giant Huawei from the U.S. added more uncertainty the following week.

The market is correct to be worried about the effects of an all-out Sino-U.S. trade war—but know that real data, not social media, drives our investment decisions.

Why I don't try to decode the U.S. presidential tweetosphere

We've seen calm on other fronts in presidential trade battles: On Friday, May 17th, the U.S. lifted tariffs on metals imported from Canada and Mexico. It also delayed imposing tariffs, by six months, on autos imported from the European Union and Japan.

From the moment Trump was confirmed as a candidate in 2016, to his latest round of “Tariff Man" talk on Twitter, I've been regularly asked how the market would react to his presidency.

Then, and now, I'm adamant that what's important is policy and how it impacts the economy. Everything else is meaningless noise, whether negotiating tactic or threat.

The firings and other antics inside the White House through 2017 were concerning. As were the Twitter taunts against North Korea's “Little Rocket Man" over use of nuclear weapons. Yet, looking back to that year, new policies proved good for the markets and for U.S. equities in particular.

Trade tactics seem designed to seed doubts

Heading into 2018, President Trump took aim against the North American Free Trade Agreement. Until the midnight hour deadline of October 1st, the level of drama to negotiate a deal was extremely high.

Tweets suggested a real possibility that a new NAFTA, the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA), would not be signed. Given that uncertainty, that late in the year, many Canadian corporations delayed their investments—a factor that contributed to weaker data over the fourth quarter of 2018, and into the first quarter of 2019.

It can take months for renewed corporate investment to be reflected in economic data, and that's exactly what we've seen with the 100,000+ jobs created in Canada this past April.

Set your twitter calendar for the G20

Now that the U.S. trade focus is clearly on China, we have to realistically put things into perspective with regards to the global economy.

The U.S imported more than US$500 billion in goods from China in 2018. That's a big number, yet only about 3.5% of China's GDP. China has also been significantly stimulating its economy over the past year. Thus, global growth is unlikely to fall off a cliff over the next 12 months.

On the other side, tightening financial conditions and deteriorating confidence could pose greater risk to U.S. growth.

The U.S. has set out a schedule to increase tariffs on the rest of its Chinese imports over the next month. The timing neatly aligns with the start of the G20 Summit at the end of June, when Presidents Xi Jinping and Trump are expected to meet in Osaka.

Logic would support a deal. Yet, I know logic doesn't always prevail in politics, and we are talking about a very unconventional president in Trump.

Investing by numbers, not hashtags

We still see a growing economy, profitable corporations and a low interest rate environment for the foreseeable future. For these reasons, we remain overweight equities.

While we are tactically underweight investments in emerging markets, we still expect returns for the next 10 years to be fairly good, and are still forecasting superior economic growth for those markets.

Amid the daily drama of Twitter-fired trade talks, it's important to act on the facts. The U.S. and China, the world's two largest economies, have been on a collision course for some time—that's no surprise to us. More unexpected is how the row is being played out, both in hyperbole and in the public eye.

If you have concerns about how U.S.–China trade may affect your own portfolio, please count on your MD Advisor for a fact-based reality check.

About the Author

Patrick Ercolano

Patrick Ercolano, CFA, MBA, is a former Lead Portfolio Manager with the Investment Management and Strategy team at MD Financial Management. He oversaw the strategic and tactical asset allocation mandates, alternative investment mutual funds and was a member of MD’s Tactical and Risk Allocation Committee.

More Content by Patrick Ercolano
Previous Article
The ultimate guide to financing your medical school education
The ultimate guide to financing your medical school education

Paying for medical school can be expensive. Learn about government student loans and student lines of credit.

Next Article
Maximum employment and 2% inflation: The Fed holds rates steady
Maximum employment and 2% inflation: The Fed holds rates steady

As expected, the U.S. Federal Reserve did not raise interest rates this week and have indicated that they w...


Subscribe to our Newsletter

I allow MD Financial Management (including MD Financial Management Inc., MD Management Limited, MD Private Trust Company MD Life Insurance Company and MD Insurance Agency Limited), the Bank of Nova Scotia and other members of the Scotiabank group of companies (“Scotiabank Members”) to send me electronic messages (such as emails and SMS text) about their products and services, offers, events, and other valuable information as well as information about the products and services of other Scotiabank trusted partners that may be of interest to me.  This consent is being sought on behalf of each MD Financial Management and Scotiabank Member which includes any company(ies) or person(s) that form a part of the Scotiabank group of companies in the future. View the MD Privacy Policy here.
Thank you!
Error - something went wrong!